tags 891072 - patch thanks Dear Michael,
> Please review and merge the attached patch. Thanks! Thank you so much for your patch. Can you fix up the following small things? Naturally, please re-add the "patch" tag when ready :) +Tag: golang-missing-built-using +Tag: golang-built-using-on-arch-all These seem quite "clumsy" wordings and difficult to understand when out of context - can you try expanding them a little? In addition, please make it very explicit about what them maintainer should do if they see this message. For example, something phrased along the lines of "please add..." +Info: This package builds a binary package which is not including ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ does not include + ${misc:Built-Using} in its Built-Using control field. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^ <tt> … </tt> <tt> … </tt> + if ($arch eq 'all […] + if ($arch ne 'all' Is there a cleaner way of structuring these? +++ a/t/tests/binaries-golang-built-using/desc ^^^^^^^^^ This probably should be prefixed with "control-file-" as that's the name of checks/foo.pm. Are we missing a Test-Depends in the "desc" file too? :) Thanks again! Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-