Package: mc Version: 1:4.6.1-1exp1 Severity: wishlist
Isn't it time to upload the UTF-8 patched version of mc to unstable? It has been in experimental for five weeks now, and AFICS no bugs have been reported against it. This may be because hardly anybody uses it; after all, the Policy Manual says about the experimental distribution: The packages with this distribution value are deemed by their maintainers to be high risk. FWIW, I don't see what the risk is here :-) I've been using this version for a week or so, running it in uxterm and on the Linux console (after `unicode_start'), and mc seems to work just fine. The only caveat is that the locale and terminal settings must match, i.e. if the value of LANG ends in .UTF-8, the terminal must be in unicode mode and vice versa. I admit that I only use a small subset of mc's features, and there can and probably will be some problems with the UTF-8 patches; but to find them, broader testing is required, which can only be achieved by uploading to unstable rather than experimental. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.32 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages mc depends on: ii libc6 2.3.6-2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.5-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgpmg1 1.19.6-21 General Purpose Mouse - shared lib ii libslang2 2.0.5-1 The S-Lang programming library - r mc recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]