Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> writes: > Le 28/03/2018 à 21:40, Felix Natter a écrit : > >> I tried several variations of javadoc's -exclude parameter: >> >> -exclude "org.knopflerfish.framework.bundlestorage.dex" >> -exclude "org.knopflerfish.framework.bundlestorage.dex.DexArchive" >> -exclude "org.knopflerfish.framework.bundlestorage.dex.*" >> -exclude "org/knopflerfish/framework/bundlestorage/dex" >> -exclude dalvik.system >> [...] >> >> Do you have an idea what I'm doing wrong? To me it looks like -exclude >> is broken/ignored. If we can't fix the javadoc invocation, I suggest >> to patch out DexArchive.java. >> What do you think? > > I gave it a try and I haven't been able to get the -exclude option to > work as documented either. I managed to build the javadoc with the > "--ignore-source-errors -Xdoclint:none" options, but this may break > again in the future. > > I suggest simply removing the -java-doc package, it has a low popcon and > no reverse dependencies.
I agree, thanks for looking into this! Is the following ok for getting rid of the -java-doc package (I don't think it makes sense to keep an older doc package)? Package: libknopflerfish-osgi-framework-java Architecture: all Depends: ${misc:Depends} -Suggests: libknopflerfish-osgi-java-doc +Provides: libknopflerfish-osgi-java-doc +Conflicts: libknopflerfish-osgi-java-doc +Replaces: libknopflerfish-osgi-java-doc Many Thanks and Best Regards, -- Felix Natter debian/rules!