On 2018-03-30 16:20, Luca Boccassi wrote: > Andreas, what should we do here for Stretch? If we update stretch to > 384.130 we'll need the new glx-alternative too as they updated the > SONAMEs (a bit strange for an LTS branch), but as-is it will be borken, > unless I'm missing something.
I prepared a stretch update for glx-alternatives in branch stretch. Andreas