On 2018-03-30 16:20, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Andreas, what should we do here for Stretch? If we update stretch to
> 384.130 we'll need the new glx-alternative too as they updated the
> SONAMEs (a bit strange for an LTS branch), but as-is it will be borken,
> unless I'm missing something.

I prepared a stretch update for glx-alternatives in branch stretch.


Andreas

Reply via email to