On Wednesday, 4 April 2018 22:20:08 CEST Cédric Boutillier wrote: > So I think "build-depend on gem2deb" would be > the best criterion. > > Now a decision based on the Maintainer field would possibly cover more > than 95% of the cases already, with (almost?) no false positive.
Well, the fact that XS-Ruby-Version pops in or out depending on the value of a parameter is based on a mechanism that does not support checking the content of a list. This would require quite a change in the core Config::Model library. That's why I proposed using Maintainer field. Let's try the easy way, i.e. using Maintainer field. If this cause too much problems, I'll see what I can do to use a build-depend item. Is this fine with you ? All the best