Package: sponsorship-requests Followup-For: Bug #896970 > 1. This package misses dependency libconfig-dev
Added. > 2. Please fix the lintian warnings. e.g. > > W: odp-doc: privacy-breach-generic I will try to. Privacy breaches come from generated documentation. > 3. debhelper compat level and the standards-version is a bit old. > The latest compat is 11, and standards-version is 4.1.4. > See debhelper(7) section COMPATIBILITY LEVELS for compat checklist. > See https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ for the standards upgrading > checklist. Ack > 4. Please break the lines whose length exceeds 80 characters in > debian/control and rules. Ack > 5. Could you explain why these lines exist? Package libodp-linux-dev > seems not exist. Packages libodp-linux-dev and libodp-linux119 are virtual package, provided by different implementations of ODP API. We are providing another ODP implementation, implemented specifically on top of DPDK (https://github.com/Linaro/odp-dpdk). It is not packaged (yet). These two implementations are binary compatible. It is planned that odp-dpdk will have libodp-dpdk119 (Provides: libodp-linux119) and libodp-dpdk-dev (Provides: libodp-linux-dev) packages. Would you recommend how should I better document and/or implement these packages. > 6. Must we provide a example package with pre-built binaries shipped? > > 77 Package: odp-linux-examples > > Why can't we put the source of these examples into the doc package? > Or why don't we choose a name such as libodp-tools / libodp-utils > to avoid ambiguity? libodp-test-utils? These tools are mostly testing programs, that can be used either by autotests (in future) or users (to check that their ODP installation works). > 7. your patch directory is empty, could you please remove it? Sure, removing > 8. Changelog: This is the first-time upload. Could you change the file > so that it looks like this: OK. I will upload updated package with shortened changelog. > 9. debian/docs This file looks useless ? Dropping now. > 10. Why is the package containing > ./usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libodp-linux.so.119.0.0 > named libodp-generic119? See point 5. > 11. Why is dh_auto_test overrode to empty? We had issues with make check before, they interacted strangely with build environment, that is why it is disabled for now. I plan to reenable it later. -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.15.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_GB:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled
