On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 10:16:17AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> But that still leaves us with Olaf's statement that he is unsure about > >> the API. > > > > That's not that hard to check. > > > > The API is defined through the header files, and below is a complete > > diff of the header files. > > > > The only thing that looks slightly suspicious is the > > kpse_file_format_type change, but I don't see any way for it to cause > > serious problems. > > That's all fine, but still I don't see any value in investing work in > the removal of libkpathsea3 now (from unstable only!), instead of filing > bugs against the packages that still use it.
As I said earlier in this bug: <-- snip --> Now that teTeX 3.0 is in testing and these testing-specific issues are no longer an issue, would you expect any problems with simply renaming libkpathsea4-dev to libkpathsea-dev (and providing libkpathsea4-dev)? <-- snip --> This should be the easiest way. > Regards, Frank cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]