2018-05-24 8:39 GMT+02:00 Andreas B. Mundt <andi.mu...@web.de>: > Package: appstream > Version: 0.12.0-3 > Severity: minor > > Dear Maintainer, > > when verifying a XXXX.metainfo.xml with > > appstreamcli validate XXXX.metainfo.xml > > I get the complain: > > … Please license the data under a permissive license, like FSFAP, > CC-0-1.0 or MIT … > > If I use 'CC-0-1.0' as license, nothing changes. If I use 'CC0-1.0' > instead, the complain disappears.
That was a typo, it's fixed in the next release. Using FSFAP[1] instead of CC0 might save your Linux distributor or yourself from including a copy of the (long) CC0 license text in your sources, so that would be the primary recommendation for metadata. Cheers, Matthias [1]: https://spdx.org/licenses/FSFAP.html -- I welcome VSRE emails. See http://vsre.info/