2018-05-24 8:39 GMT+02:00 Andreas B. Mundt <andi.mu...@web.de>:
> Package: appstream
> Version: 0.12.0-3
> Severity: minor
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> when verifying a XXXX.metainfo.xml with
>
> appstreamcli validate XXXX.metainfo.xml
>
> I get the complain:
>
> … Please license the data under a permissive license, like FSFAP,
> CC-0-1.0 or MIT …
>
> If I use 'CC-0-1.0' as license, nothing changes. If I use 'CC0-1.0'
> instead, the complain disappears.
That was a typo, it's fixed in the next release. Using FSFAP[1]
instead of CC0 might save your Linux distributor or yourself from
including a copy of the (long) CC0 license text in your sources, so
that would be the primary recommendation for metadata.
Cheers,
Matthias
[1]: https://spdx.org/licenses/FSFAP.html
--
I welcome VSRE emails. See http://vsre.info/
