Hi, On 31/05/18 15:45, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 31/05/18 15:09, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: >> >> Emilio, Seb, >> >> Can you confirm that now that we have >> a) "green light" on the transition, and >> b) the r-base package is in unstable >> we should see binary: any packages being rebuilt -- which I do not yet >> see. When will this start? > > I will start the rebuilds soon (i.e. later today).
Scheduled now (it will take some time as it's 320 arch:any packages). By the way there was a problem with my suggested jdk change: the architecture restriction is applied first, and then the first alternative is taken, so for e.g. m68k, openjdk-10-jdk is taken as it's the first valid alternative for that architecture. But we don't want jdk there at all. So there are two good options: default-jdk [!arm !hppa !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !hurd-i386] i.e. drop the openjdk-10-jdk alternative, or default-jdk [!arm !hppa !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !hurd-i386] | openjdk-10-jdk [!arm !hppa !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !hurd-i386] i.e. add the architecture restriction to openjdk-10-jdk as well. I'd go with the former, but both should work. If you can apply one of those changes that'd help. Sorry for not realising that earlier. Cheers, Emilio