On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 17:33 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > In order to avoid surprises, and because history teaches us that > relying on people to manually check things is doomed to fail, it > would be useful to have a number of reports on the state of the > archive generated and the results e-mailed to us regularly. It may > also be worth considering having the results made available via the > release.d.o web site.
I've started a "suite-report" script to cover this. > (During initial discussions, the suggestion was a daily status diff > with a full report being sent weekly.) Currently only the full report mode is implemented, and only for: > The set of reports I thought of so far were: > > - packages in NEW destined for pu (I have an SQL query for this > already, if it helps) Regards, Adam
