tags 901075 - moreinfo
thanks
Dear Axel,
> Example: I changed the build-dependency in wicd from python to
> python2. Now I get:
>
> E: wicd source: missing-build-dependency-for-dh-addon python2 =>
> python:any | python-all:any | python-dev:any | python-all-dev:any
Ahh, getcha! Examples are great.. :)
> > > >> I certainly don't want to have these warnings, at least not until
> > > >> dh-python
> > > >> starts generating dependencies on python2. So I assume, that I'll
> > > >> leave these
> > > >> new warnings for now.
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, can you clarify for me here — you agree that it would generate
> > > > many warnings but you wish to wait for the time being...?
> > >
> > > I'll live with the new warnings in python-defaults.
[…]
> Maybe it's because everyone fears that we will remove "python"
> (without "2" at the end) from that list already now. That would indeed
> be a bad idea (now) and I'm sure we won't do that (now).
That wasn't my confusion as that seemed rather inplausible indeed. It
was the apparent change from saying "please these warnings in lots of
packages" to "no, don't bother with that" and then finally "I'll live
with warnings in a specific package."
Anyway, thanks again for clarifying. Fix incoming...
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
