(ditto)

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:18:11AM -0500, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> (resetting autoremoval timer)
> 
> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 12:44:01PM -0500, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> > ping?
> > 
> > I cannot reproduce locally either on bare metal or in schroot.
> > 
> > -Ben
> > 
> > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 09:15:51AM -0500, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> > > Hi Lucas,
> > > 
> > > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 10:52:53PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> > > > amd64.
> > > > 
> > > > Relevant part (hopefully):
> > > > > rx/perf.................ok
> > > > > volser/vos-man..........ok
> > > > > volser/vos..............FAILED 5
> > > > > bucoord/backup-man......ok
> > > > > kauth/kas-man...........ok
> > > > > 
> > > > > Failed Set                 Fail/Total (%) Skip Stat  Failing Tests
> > > > > -------------------------- -------------- ---- ----  
> > > > > ------------------------
> > > > > volser/vos                    1/6     17%    0    0  5
> > > 
> > > Unfortunately the upstream build system does not capture verbose
> > > test output for display in case of failure, but from the test number
> > > we can deduce that what is failing is that an outputted list of
> > > addresses does not match the expected string:
> > >     char expecting[] = 
> > > "10.0.0.0\n10.0.0.1\n10.0.0.2\n10.0.0.3\n10.0.0.4\n"
> > >                        
> > > "10.0.0.5\n10.0.0.6\n10.0.0.7\n10.0.0.8\n10.0.0.9\n"
> > >                        "10.0.0.10\n10.0.0.11\n10.0.0.12\n10.0.0.13\n"
> > >                        "10.0.0.14\n10.0.0.15\n";
> > > 
> > > I note that this test is disabled when the system's hostname
> > > resolves to a loopback address because those addresses are forbidden
> > > from being entered into the database as fileserver addresses, but
> > > even when I change my local configuration to avoid that, I still
> > > cannot reproduce the test failure locally.
> > > 
> > > I surmise that the AWS machine may be getting assigned a 10/8
> > > address as its primary address, and perhaps that would interfere
> > > with some of what the test is doing.  Do you happen to know more
> > > about the network configuration on the AWS systems used for these
> > > autopkgtests?
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > Ben

Reply via email to