Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Bug#901897 closed by Jonathan Nieder
<jrnie...@gmail.com> (Bug#901897: fixed in git 1:2.18.0~rc2-2)"):
> I think it _is_ optional. At least, it was in adt-run. I think
> autopkgtest has much of the same logic. It's a question of putting
> together the right rune to specify what you want.
I am wrong. autopkgtest has a completely different command line
parser to adt-run.
https://manpages.debian.org/unstable/autopkgtest/autopkgtest.1.en.html
https://manpages.debian.org/stretch/autopkgtest/adt-run.1.en.html
adt-run's command line is a bit abstruse but I think it is more
powerful. Unfortunately adt-run was deleted.
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
