On 2018-06-24 sergio <sergio...@outerface.net> wrote: > On 24/06/2018 04:11, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
>>> could you update source to "enlightenment" as e17 is outdated. >> We discussed this a while back, and decided to leave it. See: >> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-e-devel/2015-November/002442.html > It was about three years ago. Has anything substantially changed since then? > E17 is just a intermediate version that doesn't exists more. > e17 confuses > What is wrong to leave it orphaned and remove completely afterwards? This is about the source package. Who is going to be confused? And what to what effect? You fail to convince me that this is more than an aestetic problem. On the other hand having one of the pts pages of our binary packages (<https://packages.qa.debian.org/e17>) point to the wrong source package is a usability problem /for/ /me/. Switching source package names is significant effort, not only for us but also for the for ftpmasters, which is an already resource limited core team. cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'
