I am not claiming that things aren't going to break, since as unstable users we are functioning as beta testers, which is understood, but when a significantly critical bug is identified, there is no logical reason to continue to pass it around.  I've been using the unstable branch since the 1990s and this has usually what i have seen -- save in rare cases -- when fixes are not able to be included in a timely manner.  Obviously I merely downgraded to the last functioning version of virtualbox et. al. (5.2.12-dfsg-3) in unstable but since 5.2.14-dfsg-1 is a known NBG, there is little (or actually no) motivation for it to be in the repos.
On 07/08/18 15:23, Evgeny Kapun wrote:
On 08.07.2018 22:54, Steven R. Wright wrote:
This is a critical enough bug to warrant removing 5.2.14-dfsg-1 from the repos.  I have to do selective upgrades now to avoid pulling it in.

Unstable repo is called unstable for a reason. If you want a system that doesn't break, use stable (you can install VirtualBox from backports) or testing.


Reply via email to