Hi, On 21/07/18 16:38, YunQiang Su wrote: > James Cowgill <jcowg...@debian.org> 于2018年7月21日周六 下午11:16写道： >> On 21/07/18 05:46, YunQiang Su wrote: >>> Please change the lines about mips options in debian/rules to the below. >>> # Disable some optimizations on mips*, because they are not always >>> available on these architectures >>> ifneq (,$(filter mips%r6 mips%r6el, $(DEB_HOST_ARCH))) >>> MIPS_NO_R6_OPTION = --disable-mips32r2 \ >>> --disable-mips64r2 \ >>> --disable-mips32r5 >> >> Is this line intentional (given that --disable-mips32r5 is used below as >> well)? >> > > yes. when the first try, I don't add --disable-mips32r5, then it > failed to build, > when link r2/r6 objects.
I still don't understand. In your new code, the --disable-mips32r5 option is passed unconditionally in the main config block so this extra option in the r6 block should have no effect. >> I don't think the name of that variable explains itself very well, >> especially since one of the options enables R6. Maybe MIPS_R2_R6_CONFIG >> is better? James
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
