On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 09:12:07AM -0400, James McCoy wrote: > Ironically, the change in format was prompted by comments that upstream > saw in unibilium's source code.
That couldn't possibly be true, since I began the work for the formatting change (specifically the part which we're discussing) in Februrary 2017, in a branch, publishing the first changes early in March: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-ncurses/2017-03/msg00006.html The first comments about unibilium relative to this work were a few months later, on the ncurses mailing list: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-ncurses/2017-08/msg00031.html You may be referring to this: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-ncurses/2018-04/msg00002.html which is a refinement: unibilium ignored the value, and ncurses wasn't making effective use of it. unibilium bailed out earlier than that detail... -- Thomas E. Dickey <dic...@invisible-island.net> https://invisible-island.net ftp://ftp.invisible-island.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
