Hi Chris,

Am 23.07.2018 um 14:42 schrieb Chris Lamb:
>> I don't think that adding a new binary package for OpenPGP smartcard
>> support is a good idea and would oppose to it
> 
> Might smartcard support require some smartcard-specific packaged
> dependencies that would 
> be solved somewhat elegantly by having a separate binary package?

Might be. Currently we suggest such extra dependencies for keyscripts.

Still, if we would split the gnupg smartcard keyscript into an own
binary package, we would have to do the same for decrypt_gnupg,
decrypt_opensc and decrypt_ssl. Which would mean four new binary packages.

> (Just to clarify, do you mean a new binary package as part of
> src:cryptsetup or a new binary package as part of some other
> hypothetical source package?)

Nope, just a new binary package as part of src:cryptsetup.

Cheers
 jonas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to