El lunes, 6 de agosto de 2018 09:39:48 -03 Paul Gevers escribió: > Dear Lisandro, > > On 06-08-18 13:35, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > On one side Maxy told me that many autopkg tests would need fixing due to, > > if my mind does not fails, gcc 8. > > It may have slipped in, because the autopkgtests were so much broken for > a while that I didn't check carefully if a regression was in the Qt > stack. After a while, the abi-compliance check was broken in the > reference as well, so maybe regressions due to gcc are now hidden. > Luckily the abi-compliance checker is now fixed and there are very > limited regressions in the Qt stack at this moment, ktexteditor is the > only one I am aware of.
I see, thanks! Note that I have almost no idea wrt autopkg tests as we don't use it in the Qt stack. > > On the other I took a look at the failed test (keys mapping in vi input > > mode) an tried with kate on my machine running Qt 5.11 without issues, so > > I'm suspecting the issue is indeed in the test itself. > > As I have kate on my system (buster, not fully up-to-date), I tried to > reproduce the reference as it seems that the test is doing something > simple. It appears to create a sting, executes some vim commands and > checks that the outcome is as expected. So it seems unlikely to me that > this should change. To me, either the old code was doing something > weird, or the new code is doing it wrong. The test says "Vim is weird" > so it really looks like the old result is correct. Weirdly enough I get > the same results as the "new" results of the test. So I suspect I am > doing something wrong, as I should get the reference. Which keys did you > press? Do you know what they _should_ do (my vim knowledge is close to > containing only ":q"). I used i, d, v, y, shift+p. I even retried them just now in case I missed something. I might be missing something, but at this point: - If there is a regression: * it would be small and can be worked around by using the normal editing mode. * odds are highly on the bug-on-kdepim side, as Qt 5.11.1 is just a patch release of 5.11.0 which has been shipped in other distros for months already (we skip even releases due to the fact that we need to do transitions). * If the bug is in kdepim then the best way to solve it would be to psuh a new version, for which we need a transition. - No users have complained about this so far, and we do have lots of users using unstable and reporting bugs. This has proven to be a nice regression method so far ;-) So I think the best way to go here is just let Qt migrate. Regards, Lisandro. -- lo cual parece incompatible. lógica, esa tendrá particiones dentro, si se transforma la extendida a tiene particiones lógicas, luego extendida. Una extendida estar dentro de una partición Una partición lógica necesita Diga NO al topposting. Matias Silva Bustos Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.