Hi Daniel, On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 10:45 AM Daniel Baumann <[email protected]> wrote: > thanks for maintaining ntfs-3g. There was a good maintainer before my uploads. I just follow his work.
> Current testing/unstable packages are a feature regression compared to > stable because the non-AR releases are shipped. In experimental, there's > an upload of the (almost) latest AR release, indicating that you would > revert the switch to non-AR. Indeed, there's a newer upstream AR release. Packaged it recently and uploaded, needs to go through the NEW queue. > Could you please upload the latest AR release to unstable, so that the > upcoming buster does not have a feature regression compared to stretch? I've the plan to do it soon. Some users of course will complain that it's not the latest (non-AR release), but I think I can live with that. More polished versions have preference. Regards, Laszlo/GCS
