Axel Beckert wrote:
> This lintian tag should be:
>
> a) downgraded from "Severity: normal" level to either "Severity:
> wishlist" or even "Severity: pedantic", and
>
> b) changed from "Certainty: certain" to "Certainty: wild-guess" as
> there are clearly multiple and common cases where the switch to
> dh-elpa is impossible as of now.
>
> Alternatively, the tag should be changed to be only emitted if the
> binary package is named either elpa-*, *-el or *-mode
This sounds the most sensible way forward, ie. fixing most of the false-
positives, rather than just making Lintian very slightly less noisy.
(As an aside, I'm always curious when people put a lot of weight behind
the Certainty that Lintian reports; the various levels have no "real"
meaning and accordingly get very little attention from the Lintian
maintainers.)
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
