Control: tags -1 confirmed

Hi Paul,

Paul Wise <p...@debian.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2018. aug. 11., Szo, 4:45):
>
> Package: unattended-upgrades
> Version: 1.4
> Severity: serious
>
> Recently I have had unattended-upgrades upgrade random packages from
> testing to experimental. If I downgrade the packages upgraded, I won't
> get the same packages upgraded the next day. I run apt-show-versions
> daily and save the output to my mail store. Using my mail store I found
> that the first instance of this happening was on 2018-07-06, there were
> earlier instances but they were from me manually installing packages
> from experimental and u-u doing subsequent upgrades. I noticed that I
> upgraded unattended-upgrades on that date from 1.3 to 1.4. I'm not
> sure, but the changelog indicates some package candidate changes,
> perhaps this caused the issue? I think this bug should be fixed before>
> Debian releases buster, this could break some setups.

Unattended-upgrades respect pinning to a very little extent and when I
started adding support it turned out that python-apt had less than
sufficient support for pinning to fix u-u.
Julian kindly fixed [1] python-apt quickly in git , and u-u needs this fix
in the archive before it can grow pinning support
(and make the current support work).

I proposed [2] a candidate adjustment fix which includes picking only
lower versions of packages originally offered by apt's resolver which
I believe would help in not upgrading packages to experimental.

Since pinning support in u-u never worked IMO the proper severity
would be 'important' rather than serious but I'd like to get this
fixed for Buster, too.

Cheers,
Balint

[1] 
https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/python-apt/commit/75272eeffc04d4a7345e0c1095157e9d552ada1d
[2] 
https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades/pull/137/commits/cf074c0cca1e6e9a01c7a881d362c3def85542d8

Reply via email to