Hi Helge, > However, I can live with both versions, so if it is too late > to fix lintian than so be it.
I wouldn't say it was too late, more that it has not been raised before and it would require somewhat of a big reworking of the logic so would be difficult to see this being prioritised. It would also mean your package is ipso facto different from others which — as a general rule — is not a great idea. > I personally like to have the licenses listed first, as the reader > than has a clear view of what he is expecting, before getting the > details. (Curiously, I completely agree with your reasoning but would disagree with the idea that the license blocks are the "non-detail" part.) Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-