Hello, On September 12, 2018 5:30:59 AM EDT, Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> wrote: >Hi Alex, > >On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:55:20AM +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: >> Well, according upstream, current repository is not active anymore: >> >> >> Oh, sorry. We are no longer mirroring our internal FALCON repo here. >In >> fact, I think this Issues board will disappear soon too, in favor of >> pbbioconda. So I think your source-code is way out of date. >> Unfortunately, my hands are tied. >> >> https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/FALCON/issues/672 > >Thanks for your research on this issue. > >> I am not sure how to get the source from pbbioconda and if this >source >> is suitable for packaging at all. > >I added a comment to the issue above where I've found a link inside the >bioconda metadata[1] (assuming this is what upstream was refereing to). >We can surely package where those meta.yaml files are pointing to but >see my comments. > >It would be extremely helpful if we would find somebody at PacBio who >can explain the situation (Afif? I know you said you are not using the >pb* software any more, but can you possibly help out?). As I wrote on >Monday[2] I have another issue with a lib from there. >
The pbbioconda being referred to looks like https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/pbbioconda and the README there lists all their packages and links to their main bioconda pages. Andreas, I think the pb-falcon you found is the right one as far as I can tell. regards Afif > > >[1] >https://github.com/bioconda/bioconda-recipes/blob/master/recipes/pb-falcon/meta.yaml >[2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2018/09/msg00152.html > >-- >http://fam-tille.de