Hi Paride On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 15:57:11 +0200, Paride Legovini <p...@ninthfloor.org> wrote: > Frédéric Bonnard wrote on 21/09/2018: > > As this is not a gcc bug, I'm wondering if that's just not something to > > handle on flif side also.. see that other related bug : > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906708 > > Thanks Frédéric, your findings are very interesting and I could indeed > think of a more solid way to compare the test images. Unfortunately FLIF > is not in a good shape in general, and I filed a removal request for it > as it has multiple unresolved CVEs and upstream is unresponsive: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=903600
That's a pity :( > I'll try to fix this issue anyway, but I doubt FLIF will be part of the > next Debian stable release. Ok, no worries; just wanted to give some feedback on my findings. Good luck with Flif :) F. >
pgptWOe0_y3mH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
