On 2018-10-04 19:33, Johann Felix Soden wrote: > On 03.10.2018 11:17 Andreas Beckmann wrote: > >> Rather pdftk-java should take over the pdftk binary package, s.t. there >> is an upgrade path. (A Provides: pdftk does not create an upgrade path). >> That should make the old pdftk source package go away ... > > My plan for the upgrade path was to release pdftk 2.02-3 as an > transition package that depends on pdftk-java.
That would work as well, especially if you have some hope left that pdktk upstream will resurrect it some day. There just needs to be an installable pdftk package to provide a clean upgrade path ... Andrea
