El martes, 30 de octubre de 2018 14:45:32 -03 Wookey escribió:
> On 2018-10-30 10:35 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > Source: dewalls
> > Version: 1.0.0+ds1-6
> > Severity: important
> > User: [email protected]
> > Usertags: qbs-removal
> > 
> > Hi! Qbs upstream announced yesterday that they will be deprecating it:
> > 
> > http://blog.qt.io/blog/2018/10/29/deprecation-of-qbs/
> > 
> > There are currently only two packages using qbs in the archive: qt creator
> > and dewalls. As Qt creator can use it's internal copy (and will probably
> > only need it just backwards compatibility) dewalls becomes the only
> > package that really needs it.
> > 
> > So ideally please ask upstream to switch the build system. We will
> > probably
> > ask for qbs' removal soon.
> 
> Hmm. dewalls is used by cavewhere which is also destined for Debian
> and also uses QBS. Cavewhere also uses qmath3d, plotsauce and
> lib-qt-qml-tricks, all of which build with QBS.
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/09/msg00001.html
> 
> Upstream is a big fan of QBS and really doesn't like CMake so getting
> him to change could be tricky.
> 
> So if I'd finished packaging/uploading cavewhere there would be 5
> QBS-using packages in the archive. I have done most of that work, but
> there remain some wrinkles which is wqhy t's not yet uploaded. I could
> leave them all as embedded libraries of cavewhere, but was avoiding
> that as it's generally deemed poor form.
> 
> I'll ask upstream what their plans are, but right now I would have a
> significant issue with QBS being removed as it blocks uploading of
> cavewhere which is something I've put a lot of work into over the last
> year or two.

Yes, it's a frustrating situation, but considering the latest news I'm afraid 
we are no longer interested in it's maintenance, nor we think it's really a 
good thing to keep in the archive a tool that, at least for now, it's dead 
upstream (or at very least that's the current situation, it might change). 

If someone steps up to become a new upstream for qbs we will probably be happy 
to orphan it. And supposing it becomes really detached to Qt itself.

Of course, this is a very recent situation, so you might want to contact 
upstream and see what he will be doing next.

FWIW, qbs has 4 years in the archive already, and dewalls is the only rdep 
besides qt creator (which can be easily solved).

Regards, Lisandro.

-- 
Antiguo proverbio de El Machi: "Dado el apropiado grado de profundidad, la
ineptitud es indistinguible del sabotaje"

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to