Package: 9base Version: 1:6-7+b1 Severity: wishlist Dear 9base maintainers,
mk meant to be the "a Successor to Make" (Tenth Edition Research Unix Manuals) and as mkfiles much more easier to maintain than the makefiles, i actually replaced make in my projects. Shipping those ones, i realize that mk is: * hidden in the 9base package, giving it few chances to be noticed by debian users. * installed /usr/lib/plan9/bin/mk so you need to symlink it somewhere in the $PATH to be used after the package installation. i think mk deserve it's own package and i would be pleased to help to make it happen but i don't know the best way to do it. -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.18.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages 9base depends on: ii libc6 2.27-8 9base recommends no packages. Versions of packages 9base suggests: pn wmii2 <none> -- no debconf information