On 2018-11-20 10:22 a.m., James Godfrey-Kittle wrote: > It's possible that this font actually contains illegal feature syntax, > which is still accepted by Glyphs. Or of course it could be an issue > with some component of fontmake; it's worth posting an issue on Github > to have it triaged (I was planning to do this soon when I have time).
It is also possible that the font source worked at some point with the build tool chain, then the tool chain changed, breaking the build. I am not saying this is the case here, I have not looked into the details. Just to say I have seen similar issue with my team's own fonts where a font built with the toolchain, then the toolchain was updated (in one case to fix a bug), and the build broke. So in some sense, the source was not incorrect until the build system found it to be incorrect. Bobby -- Bobby de Vos /bobby_de...@sil.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
