On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 03:14:36AM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: > Hi, > > Tobias Frost wrote: > > Yes, we're are on it (however, I hoped to dedicate a bit more time to > > this week) > > Before creating a VCS repo for it: I wonder why the package is ITP'ed > as "backuppc-rsync" despite upstream calls the software "rsync-bpc". > > Shouldn't we name the package then "rsync-bpc", too? >
Hi, In fact this version of rsync can only work with backuppc. So I think it would be better to keep this name, to reduce possible confusions. Best regards, -- Ludovic Drolez. https://drolez.com/web - Marketing automation and Web dev https://chezsandro.com - A cool place in Cape Verde :)