On Wed, 05 Dec 2018 07:43 -0500 Scott Kitterman <sc...@kitterman.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 19:11:33 +0100 =?UTF-8?Q?Moritz_M=C3=BChlenhoff?= 
> <j...@inutil.org> wrote:
> > severity nnnnnn normal
> > reassign nnnnnn ftp.debian.org
> > retitle nnnnnn RM: aolserver4 -- RoQA; unmaintained upstream, alternatives 
> exist, low popcon
> > thanks
> > 
> > > > So my question: Can we remove aolserver4 from the archive?
> > > 
> > > debian/copyright points to http://aolserver.sf.net/ where the latest 
news
> > > item is about it being copied to github in 2010.
> > > https://github.com/aolserver/aolserver got its latest commit in 2009.
> > > 
> > > This looks fairly dead to me, and unless its maintainer knows better, I
> > > don't think there is going to be any upstream security support.
> > > 
> > > It has also not been uploaded since an NMU that went into stretch, so
> > > if it's removed from unstable, it will be trivial for prospective users
> > > or maintainers to retrieve it from stretch.
> > 
> > No objections were raised in almost a year, reassigning for removal now.
> 
> There are rdepends that need to be addressed first:
> 
> Checking reverse dependencies...
> # Broken Depends:
> aolserver4-nsldap: aolserver4-nsldap
> aolserver4-nsmysql: aolserver4-nsmysql
> aolserver4-nsopenssl: aolserver4-nsopenssl
> aolserver4-nspostgres: aolserver4-nspostgres
> aolserver4-nssha1: aolserver4-nssha1
> aolserver4-nssqlite3: aolserver4-nssqlite3
> dotlrn: dotlrn
> openacs: openacs
> xotcl: aolserver4-xotcl
> 
> # Broken Build-Depends:
> aolserver4-nsldap: aolserver4-dev (>= 4.5.1-5)
> aolserver4-nsmysql: aolserver4-dev (>= 4.5.1-5)
> aolserver4-nsopenssl: aolserver4-dev (>= 4.5.1-5)
> aolserver4-nspostgres: aolserver4-dev (>= 4.5.1)
> aolserver4-nssha1: aolserver4-dev (>= 4.5.1)
> aolserver4-nssqlite3: aolserver4-dev (>= 4.5.1-5)
> aolserver4-nsxml: aolserver4-dev (>= 4.5.1)
> 
> Dependency problem found.
> 
> Please either file rm bugs for them or remove the depenency.  Once that's 
> done, please remove the moreinfo tag.

It looks like it's all done except for xotcl.

Scott K

Reply via email to