clone 357369 -1 reassign -1 autoconf retitle -1 please fail in an obvious way when CXX doesn't exist thanks
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-16 21:57]: > I'm building the whole archive with GCC/G++ 4.1. Your package failed > in a pretty strange way. As it turns you, the reason is that you > explictly call g++-4.0, but that's not installed in my chroot. > > Automatic build of quantlib_0.3.11-2.1 on bigsur by sbuild/mips 1.94 > ... > > checking for M_1_SQRTPI... no > > checking for Boost development files... no > > configure: error: Boost development files not found > > make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1 > > config.log shows what's going on: > > configure:20092: checking for Boost development files > configure:20113: g++-4.0 -c -O2 -D_REENTRANT -fpermissive conftest.cc >&5 > ./configure: line 20114: g++-4.0: command not found > > Although I wonder why the configure script doesn't fail in a more > obvious way when CXX is not available... Ben, I think autoconf could fail much earlier and in a more obvious way. At the moment, most of the log looks okay: checking dependency style of gcc... gcc3 checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... no checking whether g++-4.0 accepts -g... no checking dependency style of g++-4.0... none checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E ... The full config.log is attached. The full build log can be found at http://people.debian.org/~tbm/logs/gcc-4.1/quantlib_0.3.11-2.1_20060316-0716 What do you think? -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/
config.log.bz2
Description: Binary data
