On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 03:09:57PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: >On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 02:20:49PM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> I'd possibly do both? grub-installer is one obvious place to make d-i >> add things (and the patch there also looks fairly obvious, roughly >> what I also considered myself), but that *only* works for d-i. If we >> add the Recommends: for shim-signed, people will get a reasonable >> package set by default if they just install grub-efi-amd64-signed. >> >> Basically, I think encoding that in the normal package relationship >> with the Recommends: is the right thing to do anyway. > >Fair enough; committing your patch. Can I leave the grub-installer bit >to you? We presumably need to decide whether to have it install >grub-efi-amd64-signed rather than grub-efi-amd64 by default, at the very >least.
Sure, no problem. :-) Thanks for working through this! -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com "Since phone messaging became popular, the young generation has lost the ability to read or write anything that is longer than one hundred and sixty characters." -- Ignatios Souvatzis
