retitle 909510 Please report on unversioned Python shebangs thanks Hi Matthias,
> I don't agree with Adrian's view. If there is need to keep 2.7, then we > should > keep it to keep things running like mercurial, and afaik samba isn't yet ready > for 3.x. So yes, such a warning makes sense for bullseye. > > It's ok to stop building unused python 2.x nodules once buster released, but > that doesn't mean that we already are at the point to "aggressively to remove > any python2 usage". This bug report is less about the removal of Python 2.x modules per se but more about "unversioned" shebangs. I'm retitling this bug to match. If other distributions are going to change (re. PEP 394 [0]) then we should at least know where we stand and whether it would even be feasible. > Maybe first as a note so we can get an overview. I was also somewhat taken by this idea. I would be quite interested in knowing the numbers at the very least. Thoughts? [0] https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0394/ Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org 🍥 chris-lamb.co.uk `-