Hello Pino, On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 15:28:44 +0100 Pino Toscano <p...@debian.org> wrote: > What is the reason why you send the messages to nnn-quiet@, instead > of nnn@? -quiet means that the maintainer does *not* get any > notification, so none of your emails reach the maintainer mailing list. > Also, if the user replies, they will send their reply to nnn-quiet@ > too, still without notifying the maintainer (and thus ignored).
My intention was not to "pollute" the list with my mails, basically not containing relevant information for the bug, while these bugs are already kind of old. To hide the users answers was not my intention - but as I send by nnn-submitter@ it looks like the user gets there also the nnn-quiet@ to answer to, e.g. in 919765 #10 and #23. > In short, please do not send to nnn-quiet@. There is a very narrow > set of reasons why -quiet exists, and none of them is part of the daily > workflow with the BTS. Ok, will do, thank you for the hint. Kind regards, Bernhard