Paul Gevers writes ("Re: Conflict over /usr/bin/dune"): > For all those that haven't followed along in the bug report, the bug got > reassigned to whitedune. I'm not sure if I agree with the reassignment, > but an NMU by me is hanging in DELAYED/7 to fix the conflict in > whitedune. If people object, I'll delay it more to discuss.
I see that, apparently, this was done by NMUing whitedune to remove the symlink and using Conflicts/Replaces in ocaml dune so that it can still provide /usr/bin/dune. I think that is completely opposite to the consensus in this thread and also opposite to Debian policy. Under the circumstances I felt I wouldn't be listened to if I simply petitioned the maintainers of what is now src:dune again, so I have escalated this to the TC. See #919951. Ian. -- Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own. If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.