On 1/22/2019 7:08 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> Alternatively, we could make pigz a strict build requirement but >> that sounds a little antisocial. > Right. In what way do you consider this antisocial and what's speaking against doing that? If it's about CPU time, then maybe it should obey the parallelization setting of the build process. But then it's already a build process and if you want that to not be detrimental to your desktop performance, you nice it. Apart from that thing I really struggle to find something "antisocial" in that build-dependency.
Kind regards and thanks Philipp Kern
