On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 11:54 AM Keith Packard <kei...@keithp.com> wrote: > > Alexander Larsson <alexander.lars...@gmail.com> writes: > > $ cat /run/host/font-dirs.xml > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > > <!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd"> > > <fontconfig> > > <remap-dir real-path="/usr/share/fonts">/run/host/fonts</remap-dir> > > <remap-dir > > real-path="/home/alex/.fonts">/run/host/user-fonts</remap-dir> > > </fontconfig> > > > > Is this format acceptable? Its mostly about naming the nodes and the > > attributes, so its basically trivial. If you want i can rename things > > or change orders, but I'd really just like an Ack on something. > > Format looks OK. > > I think we might bike-shed on the names here a bit -- 'real-path' is > pretty ambiguous as both paths are 'real', one is just the file system > path and the other is the cache path. I like using the file system path > as the contents of the element and the cache path as the property, but > perhaps the property name could be 'cache-path' instead?
Or maybe 'cache-as' ?
