On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 00:23:22 +0100 Klaumi Klingsporn <klaumi...@gmx.de> wrote: > Package: cd-paranoia > Followup-For: Bug #889803 > > On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 19:24:07 +0000 Niels Thykier > <ni...@thykier.net> wrote: > > Source: libcdio-paranoia > > Source-Version: 10.2+0.94+2-4 > > > > We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the > > latest version of libcdio-paranoia > > ... > > * Remove cd-paranoia package again; the binary is also > > provided by libcdio-utils. (Reopens: #889803, Closes: > > #906112) > > Dear Niels, > > cd-paranoia is no longer provided in the package > libcdio-utils >= 0.92. Version 2.0.0 is in testing > and unstable. > > So there is no need to remove cd-paranoia from debian. There > only needs to be set a > "Breaks: libcdio-utils (<< 2.0.0)" > in the Debian/control file for the cd-paranoia package and > upgrades from stable should work fine, without trying > to overwrite anything. > > Packages that I built with this change can be found at: > apt.klaumikli.de/testing. > > You can't ban cd-paranoia from Debian because of a missing > Breaks-line! The binary is needed e.g. by whipper, the only > linux-equivalent to the ExactAudioCopy-cd-ripper in the > windows-world. > > Nevertheless: Thanks for caring about this orphaned package! > > Klaumi > > [...] Hi Klaumi,
I undid a faulty change I uploaded/introduced; nothing more, nothing less. From here the floor is open; I am not holding you (or Benjamin back, who also showed interest in this). However, I have spent the energy / time I was willing to use on libcdio-paranoia for the next many years. "Someone else(tm)" will have to (properly) introduce the binary if they want it. It would be even better if they had a stake/interest in libcdio-paranoia (which I do not) and could become the maintainer of the package. Thanks, ~Niels