Quoting Xavier (2019-01-31 08:27:57) > Le 30/01/2019 à 23:47, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > Quoting Xavier (2019-01-30 22:54:53) > >> Le 30/01/2019 à 22:34, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > >>> Quoting Xavier (2019-01-30 22:26:57) > >>>> Le 29/01/2019 à 22:17, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > >>>>> Source package contains below <dist/> several files embedding code > >>>>> from external project fileOverview Kickass, without source > >>>>> included. > > > > Just a clarification: Name of external project is Popper.js: > > "fileOverview" is just a marker, and "Kickass" is first word of > > Popper.js short description. > > > > > >>>> I succeed to build source, but this needs: > >>> [snip] > >>> > >>> This bugreport tracks twitter-bootstrap4 violating Policy in > >>> shipping code without source. > >>> > >>> For discussing packaging of that source in a separate package, > >>> please file an ITP bugreport (or an RFP bugreport if you don't > >>> intent on doing the work yourself), and let's discuss packaging > >>> issues there. > > > >> Also is it OK if I remove dist/bootstrap.bundle.* in Files-Excluded ? > > > > Sorry, I don't understand your question. > > > > What do you mean by "also"? Did I miss some previous conversation that > > this is an addition of? > > > > Are you asking if it is ok to violate Debian Policy here? Or is your > > question a different one? Please try rephrase... > > That's not what I said.
Sorry for putting words in your mouth. What did you (mean to) say? > Anyway Jérémy found a way to patch this "grave policy violation". Yes, and that is great. I am still interested in understanding what you intended to say above. > In the same way, should you open a similar bug to any of the packages > which embeds bootstrap? Yes. I should, you should, we all should. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature