On Jan/31, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > The underlying issue is that the "js" in python-jsbeautifier stands > for JavaScript, and python-jsbeautifier fail to properly expose the > JavaScript part of the project as a shared library! > > The straightforward solution is for python-jsbeautifier to also build > libjs-beautify and node-beautify!
I unfortunately do not have the available bandwidth to work on that, and I'm not also not particularly interested in maintaining any node-* stuff. I'm however totally fine with someone taking over python-jsbeautifier and doing just that. Cheers, -- Seb
