On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 11:56:50AM +0100, Thierry fa...@linux.ibm.com wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for pointing out that my analysis wasn't good - the arm patch > doesn't change anything for ppc64el (which make sense whatsoever) - the > problem on ppc64el is similar to the one on arm except the test value > are opposite ! ( which was confusing). > So what do we need to do ? expect that someone with a better expertise > help going though it ? ( can you confirm we stay with that bug for both > arch or do we need to open one for ppc64el ?)
As long as we are sure that its just a rounding error I think an apropriate solution would be to ignore the error for ppc64el (either exclude the test or run dh_auto_test || true to be able to inspect the log. Do you think that's in your interest? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de