Hi, Debian Bug Tracking System writes: > Processing commands for [email protected]: > > > retitle 849754 RFS: guerillabackup/0.0.1-1 [ITP] > Bug #849754 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: guerillabackup/0.0.1-1/0.0.1-1 [ITP] > Changed Bug title to 'RFS: guerillabackup/0.0.1-1 [ITP]' from 'RFS: > guerillabackup/0.0.1-1/0.0.1-1 [ITP]'.
Thanks for correcting this one, seems I have misunderstood the documentation regarding bug naming. I uploaded a new test-build of the package to https://mentors.debian.net/package/guerillabackup to verify, that gbp/salsa-build still works and no new lintian errors/warnings due to new rules are reported. ******************************************************************* CAVEAT on sponsoring: I detected by chance, that outbound messages from bugs.debian.org were corrupted under some conditions, affecting some part of the mentoring/sponsorship communication process. If due to greylisting someone happened to read message from the bug tracker before receiving the message addressed directly (quite likely), the content of the message might have been largely truncated, thus looking like being an incomplete answer to mentor feedback. While the messages sent out from bugs.debian.org were corrupted, the bug tracker web interface will show the complete, unmodified message initially sent. If you were wondering about my strange replies, please check https://bugs.debian.org/849714 https://bugs.debian.org/849754 Sorry about the inconvenience! hd
