On Tuesday, 12 February 2019 17:44:39 CET Gedalya wrote: > On 2/13/19 12:38 AM, Jan Wagner wrote: > > backports is not meant for fixing things. beside that it would require > > all rebuilding most of the additional apache modules not shiped by the > > apache2 source package. > > So we're back to doing nothing at all? > > I'm not at all advocating backports as a solution, rather suggesting that it > would be _something_ that could be done while the issue is not fixed, for > whatever reason. > > As for rebuilding other sources packages, yes, but like you said, not only > is backports not for fixing things, it has been traditionally known to > break things as well. Packages from backports are indeed sometimes not > installable to some users. > > In my case I wasn't using any other modules (PHP via fcgi), so apache2, apr > and apr-util were enough. Again, we're not forcing anyone to use this, nor > are we saying that this addresses the issue.
I will think about it. It I definitely won't have time in the next 2-3 weeks. Cheers, Stefan