Le mardi, 19 février 2019, 01.59:18 h CET Steve McIntyre a écrit : > While I'm not necessarily disagreeing with the overall point(s) here, > some of the points in this list of arguments seem dubious at > best. Maybe you could expand?
Sure. Sorry for publishing a new ballot before answering. > >* booting with `/` only is not systematically tested in Debian anymore; > > I'm assuming you mean "/ without /usr" here? Yes. Clarified this point by merging it with the "separate / and /usr" one above. > >* the packaging infrastructure to install files outside of `/usr` is not > > standard and represents technical debt: > > I have no idea what you're suggesting here. Same here (clarified in the ballot). What I'm trying to say here is that installing (e.g.) libs to /lib instead of /usr/lib is usually a deviation from standard software building (either in upstream packaging, or in debian/rules), that needs to be maintained on the long-term. Cheers, OdyX
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.