Package: base-files Version: 10.1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation? I was packaging a tool with that license without shipping it. * What outcome did you expect instead? I wished I could refer to a file /usr/share/common-licenses/Artistic-2.0 instead of copying it. The original license is on https://opensource.org/licenses/Artistic-2.0 Best, Steffen *** End of the template - remove these template lines *** -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.20.0-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages base-files depends on: ii gawk [awk] 1:4.2.1+dfsg-1 ii mawk [awk] 1.3.3-17+b3 base-files recommends no packages. base-files suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
