On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 12:20:05AM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>Package: src:libmcrypt
>Version: 2.5.8-3.3
>Severity: serious
>Tags: ftbfs
>Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
>
>Hi!
>
>I've been doing a full rebuild of the Debian archive, building all
>source packages targeting armel and armhf using arm64 hardware. We are
>planning in future to move all of our 32-bit armel/armhf builds to
>using arm64 machines, so this rebuild is to identify packages that
>might have problems with this configuration.
>
>While doing this, I found that libmcrypt failed its test suite for
>armel running on arm64:
>
>...
>Algorithm: enigma... failed compatibility
>Expected: f3edda7da20f8975884600f014d32c7a08e59d7b
>Got: 216540d5d71ec2d57f626a5609a3ebedbb9b32e4
>...
>
>I've tested on amd64 and things look fine, but building for arm64 on
>arm64 also fails with exactly the same test failure as armel-on-arm64.

Just retested again today at a BSP. The failing test (the enigma
self-test) works OK on amd64, but fails reliably and repeatedly on at
least arm64, armhf and ppc64el with the same failing result.

I can only assume that something has changed in compiler setup here -
these tests all passed when last uploaded over 4 years ago. Last
"maintainer" upload in 2009. Arg. :-(

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.                                st...@einval.com
"I've only once written 'SQL is my bitch' in a comment. But that code 
 is in use on a military site..." -- Simon Booth

Reply via email to