Hi Peter, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > […], this looks like a bug in lsb-base. And indeed, it is and > > is also already reported: https://bugs.debian.org/921558 > > > > Reassigning accordingly. > > Thanks for reporting this and for your analysis!
You're welcome. > I came up with the same result […] To be honest, I don't think I > should upload stunnel with a patch that makes the init script use > the LSB start_daemon function to start the process and then uses > start-stop-daemon directly to stop it; […] I would prefer some kind > of change in init-functions that would let me continue to use the > LSB shell functions. *nod* I submitted a patch to #921558 which seems to fix the issue for at least stunnel, but I think it should get some more testing before uploading that as a fix. Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 `- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE