Package: kernel-patch-ctx Followup-For: Bug #277394 Some quotes from the linux-vserver mailing list on this subject:
> I'd really like to see the official Debian packages updated and uploaded > w/ decent kernel-patch packages but unfortunately we still have > something of a stand off between the current Debian maintainer and > linux-vserver upstream regarding the state of linux-vserver and if it's > 'unstable' or 'stable'. > I thought this was being worked on and I'm a little disappointed at the > lack of comment from those who'd been working on it. > Is the current debian maintainer actually maintaining the > kernel-patch-ctx package at all? > The current version in unstable is still 1.29. > It seems like the vserver developement branch is misunderstood by the > people who decides what comes into unstable. It's like they think that > the vserver development branch is still in development (not finished) > and therefore not working. The 1.2 version of vservers pretty much everyone recommends against using, and instead recommend the 1.9 set. If you are concerned about putting 1.9 patches into Sarge, updating the package and then filing an RC bug against that version to keep it from going in is appropriate. What is the status of the updated tools and kernel patch? Thanks, micah -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages kernel-patch-ctx depends on: ii bash 2.05b-24 The GNU Bourne Again SHell ii grep-dctrl 2.1.8 Grep Debian package information ii kernel-patch-scripts 0.99.35 Scripts to help dealing with packa ii patch 2.5.9-2 Apply a diff file to an original -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
