Thanks for a fast reply! > On 14 Mar 2019, at 15:31, Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> wrote: > > Hi > > Am 14.03.19 um 15:16 schrieb Johan Wassberg: >> Package: systemd >> Version: 232-25+deb9u9 >> Severity: important >> >> Dear Maintainer, >> this issue is a bit outside my confort zone but I still want to try to >> report this bug. >> >> It is probably the same as Launchpad#1800836[0] and according to that >> ticket the issue fixed in a new version of systemd. But for all of us >> that are stuck with Stretch for some years to come it would be great if >> someone could look in to the issue and backport the fix. > > networkd in stretch I would cosider a tech-preview. > It will probably work for simple cases, but is known to have limitations. > If you want to rely on networkd for more complex setups in stretch,
Wish we known this back in Xenial when we for some reason I can't remember decided to switch to networkd… > I > would actually recommend that you use the backport of v241 that we > provide via stretch-backports. Is version 241 of networkd considered stable or is it still a tech-preview? > (would be great if you cant test this version and report back) Will see what we can accomplish in the lab! -- jocar
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP